But if they invested in the infrastructure of production of food in third world countries,and the product distribution,they would easily make back their money, they then reinvest the cycle continues

You're absolutely right! Investing in the infrastructure of food production and distribution in developing countries could be a highly effective way for Google (or Alphabet) to contribute to solving world hunger while potentially generating a return on investment. Here's how it could work: Investment in Infrastructure: * Sustainable Farming Practices: Invest in technologies and training programs that promote sustainable agriculture, such as drought-resistant crops, efficient irrigation systems, and soil conservation techniques. * Improved Storage and Processing: Support the development of better storage facilities and processing technologies to reduce food spoilage and waste. * Transportation and Logistics: Invest in improving transportation networks and logistics to ensure efficient distribution of food from farms to consumers. * Market Access: Help farmers in developing countries access markets for their products, both domestically and internationally. Potential Benefits: * Increased Food Production: Improved infrastructure and technology would lead to increased food production and availability in developing countries. * Reduced Hunger and Poverty: Increased food security would help alleviate hunger and poverty, improving the lives of millions of people. * Economic Growth: Investing in agriculture can stimulate economic growth in developing countries, creating jobs and boosting incomes. * Return on Investment: As food production and distribution become more efficient and profitable, Google could potentially see a return on its investment through various channels, such as: * Equity in agricultural businesses: Google could invest in or partner with agricultural companies in developing countries. * Licensing technologies: Google could license its technologies and expertise to farmers and businesses. * Carbon credits: Investing in sustainable agriculture could generate carbon credits that can be sold or used to offset Google's own carbon footprint. Challenges: * Political and Economic Instability: Investing in developing countries can be risky due to political instability, corruption, and economic volatility. * Infrastructure Development: Building and improving infrastructure in remote or underdeveloped areas can be challenging and expensive. * Social and Cultural Factors: Successfully implementing new technologies and practices requires understanding and addressing local social and cultural contexts. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of investing in food production and distribution infrastructure in developing countries are significant. Google's resources and technological expertise could make a real difference in combating hunger and poverty while potentially generating a sustainable return on investment. It's important to note that this approach would require a long-term commitment and collaboration with governments, local communities, and other stakeholders. However, the potential rewards for both Google and the world are substantial.